Giving feedback

How to fire an employee without reopening the decision

Updated 24 September 2026

You have known for a week. The plan ran its course, the sign-off came through, and the meeting is on the calendar for Thursday at ten. Since then you have run it in your head every night: the first sentence, the look on his face, the question you do not have an answer for.

This page is about the conversation itself. It is not a checklist for HR, and it will not tell you whether you are allowed to do this. It will tell you what tends to happen once you have said the words, and what to hold onto when it does.

What makes this one hard

Nobody trains a new manager for this, and the people who have done it once describe it in the strongest language they have. Part of that is guilt. Most of it is something more specific: the decision is already made, and the conversation keeps trying to unmake it.

That is the trap. You walk in with a decision that is final, signed off, and not yours to reverse. He does not argue. He goes quiet, and then he asks whether anything he says now could change it. He asks again in different words. Every opening you leave, he takes, and a conversation that should have lasted four minutes becomes a negotiation you have no authority to hold.

You are not being cruel by refusing to negotiate. You are being honest about what the meeting is.

Before you walk in

Settle three things.

The decision. It has been made by the people who can make it, and you are carrying it, not reconsidering it. If any part of you is still weighing it, you are not ready to have this conversation, and you should say so to whoever asked you to have it.

The facts. Not the character judgement, the record: the plan you wrote together, the objectives it set, the ones he met and the ones he did not, and the check-ins where he acknowledged that in writing. You will not read this out. You will need it when he asks what he could have done differently.

What you need to leave with. He knows the decision, he knows it is final, and he knows what happens next: today, this week, and about a reference.

The part that belongs to HR

This page is about the conversation, not the paperwork. Whether you need a witness in the termination meeting, what goes in the letter, what the final pay includes and when it arrives, and what the law where you work requires are questions for HR and for your jurisdiction. Have those answers before the meeting, not during it. FirstSpar is not legal advice, and that applies here more than anywhere.

How to open it

Say it in the first two sentences. Not after a preamble about how hard this is for you, and not after asking how his week has been.

Ryan, I have asked you here because we are ending your employment. The decision has been made and it is final.

That is one version. Yours will be shorter or longer, but it should carry the same two facts before anything else: what is happening, and that it is not open. The pause after it will feel very long. Let it.

Knowing the opening line is the easy part. You can write it on a card. What you cannot write on a card is what you say in the ninety seconds after he answers, and that is the part worth rehearsing out loud.

What happens after they answer

He goes quiet

The silence will be longer than is comfortable, and you will want to fill it: with reasons, with sympathy, with how much you valued his work. Do not. A stream of words after the decision sounds like someone talking themselves out of it. Sit in it. When he speaks, answer what he asked.

He asks whether anything can change it

This is the question the whole conversation turns on, and he will ask it more than once, in different words. Is there anything I can say? What if I took a pay cut? Could I move teams? Each version is an invitation to reopen. The answer is the same each time, said plainly and without a new justification attached: no, the decision is final. If you add "but I understand why you would ask" or "I did push back on this myself", you have handed him a thread to pull.

He asks what he could have done differently

Here the record earns its keep. Two of five objectives, two check-ins acknowledged in writing. State it once, without heat, and stop. You are not building a case. You are answering a fair question with the facts he already knows.

He asks whether he can resign instead, or what a reference will say

These are practical questions, and a sign the conversation has turned. Answer what you know, say what you do not know, and say plainly what you are not able to promise. A vague "I'm sure we can work something out" is kinder for ten seconds and worse for a month.

The one thing to hold

Say the decision is final once, and then stay in the room after you have said it. Both halves matter. Saying it twice, with more explanation each time, sounds like doubt. Saying it once and then leaving, or handing over to HR mid-sentence, tells him you could not bear to watch. The debrief in FirstSpar calls this holding your ground under pushback, and in this conversation the pushback is not anger. It is a reasonable person asking a reasonable question three times.

What good looks like

Clarity. The message was unmistakable inside the first two sentences, and nothing you said afterwards muddied it. He could repeat back what happened and when.

Composure. You stayed steady when it turned. The silence did not make you talk, the second version of the question did not make you soften, and the mention of his mortgage did not make you apologise for a decision you did not take.

Empathy is the one people expect to see here, and it looks different from what they expect. It is not saying how sorry you are. It is acknowledging what he asked before you answer it, and giving him the practical answers he needs to walk out of the building with some dignity.

Afterwards

People who have done this once talk about being haunted by it: replaying it at two in the morning, dreaming that he is back at his desk. That is normal, and it is not a sign you did it wrong. Write down, the same day, what you said and what he asked, while it is still accurate. Then let the rest of the week be the rest of the week.

If it does not settle, talk to someone. FirstSpar is practice, not support, and a conversation like this one can deserve both.

Rehearse it before the real one

Let someone go without falling apart

You face Ryan, someone who reports to you.

You are letting Ryan go today. The improvement plan you wrote together in May set five objectives over ninety days and he met two of them. You held two check-ins along the way and he acknowledged both in writing. The decision is made, it has been signed off, and it is not yours to reverse. You have never done this before.

Objective: Say the decision is final, once, and stay in the room after you have said it.

Written at Pressure Test · Delivering hard news · Clear expectations

Three spars a week on your own conversation, no account needed. The written scenarios and the harder pushback are Pro.